Comments for crumble.org http://crumble.org Got Moo? Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:14:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on 2010 by carl http://crumble.org/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-307 carl Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:14:13 +0000 http://crumble.org/?p=50#comment-307 Where are those photos JP?? can't log in anymore Where are those photos JP??

can’t log in anymore

]]> Comment on 2010 by Phil http://crumble.org/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-238 Phil Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:54:47 +0000 http://crumble.org/?p=50#comment-238 Indeed. For us all. Indeed. For us all.

]]> Comment on An Open Resolution by pete http://crumble.org/?p=47&cpage=1#comment-56 pete Sun, 10 May 2009 16:33:09 +0000 http://crumble.org/?p=47#comment-56 The website looks smart. Hope life is well Philip John! Pete The website looks smart. Hope life is well Philip John!

Pete

]]> Comment on 1234567890 by JP http://crumble.org/?p=38&cpage=1#comment-41 JP Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:14:43 +0000 http://crumble.org/?p=38#comment-41 Now looks a bit odd :) Hello Phil! Now looks a bit odd :)

Hello Phil!

]]> Comment on Wikipaedo by JP http://crumble.org/?p=24&cpage=1#comment-23 JP Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:23:36 +0000 http://crumble.org/?p=24#comment-23 Until this week, we didn't know quite how Chinese our net-filtering has become. More hand-throwing into the air in disbelief. <blockquote><i>Sarah Robertson, director of communications for the IWF, stated that in collaboration with the Child Exploitation and Online Protection agency of the UK, the image had been rated as a "1 on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is the least offensive", representing "erotic posing with no sexual activity". On December 9, 2008, the IWF issued a statement reversing their blacklist of Wikipedia.</i></blockquote> What are the IWF doing working with an agency who also exploit children? Can we request the IWF filter themselves? Until this week, we didn’t know quite how Chinese our net-filtering has become.

More hand-throwing into the air in disbelief.

Sarah Robertson, director of communications for the IWF, stated that in collaboration with the Child Exploitation and Online Protection agency of the UK, the image had been rated as a “1 on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is the least offensive”, representing “erotic posing with no sexual activity”. On December 9, 2008, the IWF issued a statement reversing their blacklist of Wikipedia.

What are the IWF doing working with an agency who also exploit children? Can we request the IWF filter themselves?

]]> Comment on Is my remote control working? by iain http://crumble.org/?p=12&cpage=1#comment-13 iain Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:57:24 +0000 http://crumble.org/?p=12#comment-13 what is your verdict on chrome? just found out about it. cheers for all the emails dude. hope anaesthesia keeping you awake and alive... what is your verdict on chrome?
just found out about it.

cheers for all the emails dude.

hope anaesthesia keeping you awake and alive…

]]> Comment on Credit Crunch – The Blame by Phil http://crumble.org/?p=5&cpage=1#comment-4 Phil Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:27:58 +0000 http://crumble.org/?p=5#comment-4 I blame the Americans. If they hadn't "elected" Bush twice and the Republican dismantling of the post-depression Roosevelt solution, we wouldn't be in this shit. I blame the Americans. If they hadn’t “elected” Bush twice and the Republican dismantling of the post-depression Roosevelt solution, we wouldn’t be in this shit.

]]>